Im almost scared to ask @Fred Weinberg because he always delivers bad news:nailbiting:
Im glad you saw this right away- I thought a lam at first too but what about that distinct pattern?? That gives me pause- like a chain strike thru...
It could be, i took the photo at an angle.so its gonna make the 1 look a squoze taller i reckon but that 9 is curled up pretty good right?
Is this a planchet issue? Lamination? Strike thru? Straight Line, Looks like it runs underneath of the bust. I bought 5 (same token) of these all...
I think its a 67 Holder probably says 66 (gradeflation)
Ive seen those ultra high grade commems of yours. I dont see anything distracting , detracting, degrading, demeaning or demented (unless i look in...
MA Dimes are wierd anyway.
Those ARE abrasions on the cheek !! If this were an 87P, 83CC etc- i would say other Edit- you might be the Jefferson Nickel authority- but im...
Yes, but your 68 example, has a better cheek, the luster grazes in the field, dont take up as much real estate. That toning, from an artistic...
On an 1880 S... most likely from bag friction. These are supposed to be the nicest, best struck, prettiest coins in the entire series, as such...
BTW guys- i wouldnt have chosen this coin had it been graded 67 SANS the + grade. This isnt a great collections photo, so you cant cry wolf on...
Wait, what !?!??? The slab photo ????? You mean, the blurry, out of focus, pixelated slab photo is YOUR proof that the coin is accurately...
Alright, time for the reveal- [ATTACH] I voted 65, i think maybe on its best day it could eek into a 66c holder. Idk see how an 1880S (of all...
Well im late to the party but im almost forced to agree with Dave and John. Especially since John discovered this one- kachorkle. Justin they do...
Separate names with a comma.
