VF. Normal Phillideplhia issue. What a poor scam .
I would tend to agree with you, that as long as a the damaged coin is attractive and readable, it doesn't matter too much.
Yes, it seems that you were pretty badly scammed.
If it was a RELIEF as opposed to INCUSE edge inscription I would be very keen to keep it. But as it is, it is poor quality and I would like it to die.
F-15 details cleaned net VG.
Some random modern medallion.
Did he give the grades ? It seems a bit suspicious, all reasonably high...
Does he actually slab them, or just grade them ?
If you can grade badly, you are way better off than someone who can't grade at all.
I bought a 20/- for this series (in VF), because I wanted to top the grade instead of getting a larger more worn coin. The scottish Charles I...
F+ and G to me.
Fake.
It is hard to find a 16th century coin which has straight coin/medal rotation.
Another hopeless vendor. http://cgi.ebay.com/1984-Quarter-Error-Rare_W0QQitemZ200125832715QQihZ010QQcategoryZ524QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Says it exactly. The design is bigger than that on the real coin.;.
That is a really nice 97% off strike.
Some engraved coins are works of art....
1907 is in poor condition-worthless. Kwang-tung dollar looks spurious (the obverse dragon is too crude). Crown is an OK XF. Probably about $2.
VF ? I would put it a touch higher , maybe EF? This series is really normally quite weakly struck.
Umm...doesn't South Africa ?
Separate names with a comma.
