Yes, but that would be a planchet error, not a striking error
Die deterioration doubling (DDD)
From http://conecaonline.org/content/glossary.html
A cud is a striking error, any error mentioning "die" is the hammer and anvil striking dies. The others would be called planchet errors.
I buy 5 pounds for $39.99. And for the Krause, I bought the 5 disc set, 1600 to date, for $99
If you already posted it in the What's it Worth forum, why are you spamming a post here?
looks like lamination.
A Cud is where part of the die breaks off along the rim of the coin. This is not a cud
It's a deteriorated die. You'll find lots of them in the late 80s after they switched to the zincs
1966 USSR 1 Kopek Y# 126a is worth $1.00 in uncirculated condition according to the 2010 issue of Krause
People, especially on Ebay, are used to getting $18 or so per ounce (haven't checked spot lately). So if it goes down, they won't drop their...
According to my Krause, the coin pictured, KM# 106, was minted 3 years, 1980, 1981 and 1982. The new coin was first minted in 1985, KM# 156.
That's a "close" AM, but the only dates so found so far are 1992, 1998, 1999, and 2000. See the link below which says ......
Looks like post mint damage to me
Of the 103 French coins i have, this 1941 is the oldest. [IMG] [IMG]
cool, look forward to it. be glad it was only a pound, it'd take forever if it was more lol
Y# 553, worth $1.00 in BU, yours maybe worth $0.25 or so
you need to know the finess and ASW (actual silver weight) of each coin. then multiply that by current spot silver.
Here's my 2004, close 00s, which to me look normal. Until we find one without close 00s, there is no error. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Automated coin roller damage
Separate names with a comma.
