Yeah-I just think most children will collect coins from their own country...
Sweden, 1/6 ores, 1667, 1685. 1667: Fair-F for issue (crudely produced) 1685: GF, but damaged.
It's some sort of medal from early 17th century (probably saxony) or, possibly a later copy.
I keep them (with my earlier world coins) in a lighthouse coin case..
Show me a silver coin which has been "damaged" by toning. My republican denarius has a very very dark 2 millenia old tone, and it shows no damage...
Anything else notable apart from the cent ?
I actually like that coin. It's got way more character than an uncirculated would have...can't really afford it at the moment though, being a YN.
Oh right....as I have hardly any mint-state coins I can't believe this will make a difference..
Is that PVC ? It looks like light corrosion...
How weak does a strike have to be for the coin to be considered an error ? I've got a few Rosevelt dimes with some serious striking problems, but...
Nice planchet flaw ! I don't think it reduces the price too much.... Hobo-They won't slab a coin that is in the same condition as it was when...
It is more likely this coin is plated that that it is real...the metal seems to be of a different colour to that customarily used !
There is a nice coin of Braunscweig there as well....
Sometimes they don't know. Have a look at some electrum fractionals, and see how many of them are attributed.
Why is it neccessery to place your coins in a holder ? Can't they just be placed straight in the trays ?
Probably 66, although it has a few to many bagmarks to make it certain.
That coin was actually issued after George V died under Edward VIII
It's a decent mint state...but I can't tell between 60 and 70 with copper so I will leave it at that.
AVF, damage on obverse.
That is a modern tourist token manafactured with the date 1616. As for value, sorry, basically nothing.
Separate names with a comma.
