@Rosalita, I am interested, please respond to my DM
I read somewhere that this happened when they polished the original die to make proofs. Might be a proof!
It also looks very cleaned, which isn't great news.
Nice find! That's a cool number, but if there were four sixes then that would be more valuable. At least it's only one dollar.
Wow, how nice Evan. I used pcgs.com/coinfacts and their pictures to compare your picture of the date to theirs, and honestly all I can see is a...
These pictures are tough to tell... I'm going to follow bradgator and say AU58. Still a nice coin!
I'm saying 66 because there are a lot of scratches.
Stunning! Same story as before! I sent you a DM, check the tab that says "Inbox"
Hmm that looks a bit like a roll counting strike. I'm not great on VAMs, so let's wait for the others to give their opinions
I'm so sorry, I though you put that it has an error on it. Well apart from the damage, as the others said, it probably sat in some dirt for a...
That is a beaut! First of all, DON'T CLEAN IT! Second, put the thing on some paper and cover it with another piece of paper or something and don't...
Nope just lots of damage
It's a nice $5 coin. You should keep it because it's not worth selling on ebay after the fee and postage etc.
Yeah, not worth more than usual. I like to keep those types of coins though because they're different and you don't come across them all the time.
Coin #2 looks MS65 with some nice color.
Oh well it might be on the slab then. I'll change it to 68
Can I see some pictures that you have already taken? Also, what camera do you use?
I'm giving this a PR68 but no cam
The only real TPG's you should trust are PCGS, NGC, ANACS, and ICG. Anything else is probably way off standard and not trustable.
The lighting makes it either MS65 or AU55 for me, but I'm going to say more AU55 than MS
Separate names with a comma.
