The dot is not in the correct location. Given all the damage, it's probably just a remnant of that.
As everyone has said, this coin has been replated and that often gives the devices the appearance of being doubled. Replated steel cents are very...
Here's the information on how to submit it to John Wexler for attribution- http://www.doubleddie.com/402401.html However, I see no indication in...
1DO-012 which is listed on Coppercoins is a class VI. Yours is not a match.
Here's what you are seeing: http://www.errorvariety.com/OFD/MD.html It's not a doubled die.
It looks like WDDR-001. Have you checked the markers?
Nothing jumps out at me. There are so many similar ones for 1989 that it's tough to match them without in-hand comparisons. Especially comparing...
It's not the 1968D 005. That doubled die shows clearly at the inside base of the serif on the G. Your coin has a lot of die deterioration going...
The only doubling I know of for the FYs shows up on the hand. I don't know of any that effects the lettering. I see a lot die cracks in that area...
Do you have a close up of the doubling?
It appears as if the coin has spent some time in the ground and suffered from corrosion.
Definitely a class 6. Looks like 002 to me. Nice find.
I haven't seen much at all from the D models. Those die cracks on Shields seem prevalent from all mints though.
I agree with Chris. This is a contact mark.
Here's a link: http://www.error-ref.com/partial-clad-layer-before-strike/
I agree. Partially missing clad layer.
66
67.
I like the way you fish Rick.
Closest match I could find was this-...
Separate names with a comma.
