Buy what you want, life is short.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Is it safe to assume the generics are chemically inert?
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] @AcesKings just noticed, same year, but mines a little rough in comparison
I was visiting my dad who still lives in my childhood house and found a couple coffee cans of pennies I had when I was kid. I thought some looked...
64
64+ DMPL hits below the eye keep it from 65+
Tough to tell, but it does look like it may be a 64, maybe I'll take @Morgandude11 s advice and dip it.
Thanks to everyone who participated. [ATTACH]
63 PL
Either the coin 2 photo is sharper, or the coin 2 strike is better (just a newbie opinion)
I would've thought coin 2 got the better grade. If you said pick one and it's yours I'd take the 2nd. Looking at the pics even the lettering is...
I'm going to say 64, the bottom bands seem to merge, but it could just be glare so I'll say no fb. Coin 2 looks fb and sharper details to me
MS 64 I like your pics better than their pics
Yes, too late, but thanks. Good to know for future reference.
Yes, 1899. I didn't notice the typo, I don't think I can edit the title. The toning does make it tough, but the reverse is fairly clean.
If he gets it I'm going to start selling ridiculous stuff too. There's an a55 for every seat.
Anyone up for another? EDIT 1899 [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
You gotta wonder why it isn't slabbed.
Separate names with a comma.
