comparing to my other 63s and 64s they all have about the same luster.
well it is what it is. doesn't look polished to me, if that was the case there would be a lot more scratch marks. If this coin was well struck it...
how can you tell?
I don't think its cleaned at all, it was just a weak strike and 1904 O's are known for that. There are no signs of cleaning whatsoever. It has...
Thank you for this info, I will keep this in mind when I go to Whitman expo this winter. I may end up picking up some 80's and 81's labeled PL...
Thats what I mean, the reverse is perfect, and the obverse looks like it got struck with a capped die.
Well they're both pretty much in the same range haha.
I thought it was possibly a clip on the Indiana quarter.
I know, they are beautiful coins and very affordable, the PL I think is a DMPL is an 1880 S though.
Found these two roll hunting, interning coins. Would love some feedback, Im thinking one of them was either struck on the wrong kind of planchet...
Of course, the slab does kinda throw things off.
This is why I only go through PCGS and NGC
Indeed.
So I took a bunch of silver I had to a pawn shop that I bought for 14 when it was low to try and sell for 17. I had around half a key. They tried...
I forgot to mention that my other PL is an 1881 S. So I suppose they would be in the same category?
Possibly just the angle and the slab, heres another pic I took. Nice Cameo frosty face and intense mirrors.
nicely said, I honestly didn't know that about the earlier S Morgans. I will keep that in mind when purchasing others in the future. I picked this...
I ask because I like input lol and maybe a chance to talk with other coin enthusiasts
Nice coin! The 1881 wouldn't, but the 1880 S (first photos) have a reflective mirrors like yours.
Separate names with a comma.
