I voted/commented before the reveal, also, but my post appeared well after/below the reveal. Would think they'd post these in chronological order.
If that's not a 66+ or 67, somethings wrong...and it ain't with the coin...! And if I were grading, might even go 68 assuming in-hand review.
Actually, you could say it's just missing a zero...has all numbers 1-9...as it does have a '1' in several places as a ONE Dollar bill...! :woot:
Indeed a great example to consider...and it somehow settled in the bag just right and beat the odds all the way to its destination. That, or was...
Maybe at the very bottom of the neckline, just above-left of the '1' in date...can't be sure from photo what that is. Also, in the hair, just...
Don't do facebook, but can you even do that..."purchased on facebook"...? Is it becoming or developing a marketplace to somehow compete with eBay...?
For $10, I'd keep it, esp if born in '52 (like me!) or something. You just don't see/find all those consecutive "oughts" (eggs, bagels, etc.)
A couple of very recognizable actors, if not their names. Does anyone remember the short-lived series, "The Millionaire" circa late 50s...? About...
Well, the one more/most noticeable aspect of the 1970-S small-date in the pic is the mint mark...the location...a bit off center not so much but...
It would seem to me that any sale and such of items like this should require a total positive disclosure by the seller(s)...UP FRONT...and clearly...
To clarify, there is not a "film" applied to the surface of, and/or around, the coins when minted, at/by the mint, etc...and so a "film" cannot be...
And I've seen/done similar several times...even shared it on this forum a time or two but nothing so good/well as this. This is one of the...
Have only ever bought 2 or 3 items/shipments from Europe (Germany and Scotland)...coins and a large medal. Had enough trouble just figuring out...
I don't sell (on eBay) but have had plenty of buyer and website dealings with them and am not a happy camper. After reading your posts and what...
Looks 64 PL at minimum...may well be 65 and DMPL. Sometimes close-up photos expose so many minute imperfections that it makes it look far worse...
To me...me...agree to disagree with grade and others...think it's better than 63 from following standpoint...but of course it's all subjective...
Yes, hold onto at least the P's...maybe put a few out and up for sale with good marketing as to what they are to entice/attract interest...you...
Genuine, legit, real, authentic, etc...VERY nice for $20! Went to a rural (my area) Indiana estate/farm auction this past Sat. and raw/worn 1921...
I could see a 64 on the reverse but not the obverse...the face marks keep to no more than a 63, but I like the coin and the subtle champagne tones.
Is that DH930 the Dalton-Hammer number...?
Separate names with a comma.
