I agree with PMD
I’m leaning to both sets of photos are the same coin but the second set has been altered, softened contrast. I would think it would grade MS 61....
Looks to be a sever die crack but surprised it doesn’t extend to the rim. Could be a possible strike through as well.
I agree with 62. The cheek hit.
She's a real Peach. Congrats.
I never remember what I forgot, and when I do, I forget what it was that I didn't remember. But I will definitely forget old what's his name....
Sorry, normal quarter to my eye.
MaryK. I was lucky to get a couple of the CC's but was also trying for the O. Message me and maybe we can work out a trade.
Nice find. Makes me want to check the tubes I haven't opened. Decisions!
+2
Here are my best two examples. All others have worked hard in their time. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Don't see the Indian, but a beauty nevertheless.
I see it now. First thought was you meant to say 1853 -oh (no). Nice find.
I believe it's a fake. The reverse feathers are from the 1878. Experts?
No one mentioned water. One of the best solvents around. It made the Grand Canyon.
I ordered the privy "O", 4 times, the site crashed during processing each time but the last. Then it set at "processing" for several hours with a...
Thanks for the info. The spot on the reverse is true color. The apparent toning on the obverse is a result of the lighting. In hand, it's white.
Thanks for the opinion. I'm thinking the same. Getting better with the photos too. Thanks for that. Was referred to "PhotoScape" Great tool.
Here's the photos. There is a small toning spot on the reverse. In hand you don't see the apparent doubling of DOLLAR on the obv. [ATTACH]
Hello Wood Duck and Wizank. I would be surprised if there was deliberate intent to hold back certain rolls, but not beyond possibility. I think...
Separate names with a comma.
