Yes they are coming in as new messages are added. Thanks
Here are a few older publications on eBay and the reprint is also there:...
Hard to see on your image.
The column doubles can be found on 4 bays on the design. This is the normal design: [IMG] The other doesn't look like doubling from what I can...
I've got to recheck my images. Your probably correct. [IMG] Yes wrong date.
Are you referring to these differences for the different RDVs? I didn't label them as I was unsure which was which? [IMG] So I need an image of...
Done.
PMD. The mint process would not leave an error like that. It is a garage job.
Years back after reading about the 2004 DDR's I started thinking: If this could happen that year, I'm checking other years for the same DDR on a...
The tool flatten the rest of the date and the reverse is damaged as well.
It is a small date doubled die. I didn't see a listing for it on coppercoins or in Wexlers blue book. But he has other ones not in that...
Machine doubling on "STATES".
Looks like the C & S hub had these letters broken off. Nice RPD.
Looks like machine doubling on the entire coin.
You can see the copper through the coating on the reverse. Try a 1943 steel cent and compare the strength of attraction on your coin. Big difference.
Or die wear can enlarge the devices. It is not hub doubling.
I thought so. Good to meet up again.
an overlay confirms that this is 1951D-1MM-008, or CONECA 1951-D RPM-008. Nice find.
Getting the right microscope is better. You can get a fixed power, or 2-3 different ones. You can get them too strong. Or you can get the infinite...
I would think a small premium. But know what you have makes your day. The Cud would be of more interest.
Separate names with a comma.
