Looks like coin wrapper damage to the edge of your coin. Happens.
Circulation and MD pretty well finished that coin off.
Looks like it was run over by a wagon! I can't imagine anyone hating that coin that much.
Too bad for that one. That should have been treated better in life.
Machine doubled (actually damage to the devices) come from a normal die. The movement during the strike damages the devices reducing them in size....
But it still gives us an idea that few of these are out there.
I just looked at the PCGS population report for graded BN: 1969-S 1C Doubled Die Obverse, BN about 30 known So there are just a few examples...
Here is what you should be seeing on a this hub doubled die: [IMG] [IMG] Your coin just appears to be a coin from a very worn die. (LDS)
Machine doubling happened a lot on the 1968-1972 cents. Normal die with die movement caused the damage to those devices. It even happens on true...
The vertical lines look like coin contact from another coin in circulation.
2000
[IMG]
If you remove the green, you will remove part of the surface of the coin. Best to leave that alone.
AU-58 1943 Philly
I've seen that before also: [IMG]
The reverse looks normal. So it must be a lamination issue as it is in a straight line. Thanks for the image.
What does the reverse look like?
The spots on the reverse are distracting and will lower the grade.
It is a MAD, but they are common. The ones that catch my interest is when the devices fall over the rim area: [IMG] [IMG]
This might help you: http://www.pcgs.com/Photograde/ Just pick the series and go from coin wear on the examples you desire.
Separate names with a comma.