compare with this http://www.coinfacts.com/colonial_coins/massachusetts_coppers/1788_ma_cents/1788_ma_cent_ryder_01_D.htm
they were supposed to be connected tof form an ice cream cone. this is the rare "detached cone" error
and the dime dies only struck one side.....NOT!
[IMG] Great Britain Proof set forms a shield
looks like glue. soak it in pure acetone as it won't hurt the coin and if it is glue it will most likely loosen it
the fact that the date and mintmark are doubled in the same way is a sure indicator that this is MD and not true doubling as they were applied to...
He said funny looking not funny smelling....
I agree with what gronnh20 and Chris said and will add that on the 55 that is die cracks in the head
pre cave painting.....
the raised portions of the coin are the deepest part of the die and therefor not effected. a clash is mostly seen in the fields of the coin....
the 59 might be a clashed die from the top of the memorial...
[ATTACH] so this one I picked up for $10 a couple weeks ago wasn't a bad buy?
he must not like you, I have a like on every one of my posts!:smuggrin:
Must be postmarked by the 4th
I would like to think it was a coincidence that it was the exhibit chairman's nephew that won with off center strike coins that formed a clock......
When I exhibited my 1982 Lincoln DDR-001 discovery coin one judge seemed determined not to see me get first place. They refused to give me full...
showing borrowed items would be a violation of ANA regulations. all pieces must be the property of the exhibitor.
so did I, it took me 13minutes + just to remember how to change my signature....
Come on Frank I figured it out in 14 minutes, surely you can.....
LIKE THIS.....
Separate names with a comma.
