I have a passion for the Hobby; some of these do keep me up at night...
This example has the 13th different "PCGS" cert number used for the fake MS64 1881-CC "Morgan" Morgan$'s: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
As long as the "coin" is in a genuine PCGS slab...
Good eye! [ATTACH]
I have- no chip (yet)!
1st seller ended his listing, 2nd was removed. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Cert had no on-line image; comparison images to a known genuine example....
Latest "whack"; just had an email on this one today: [ATTACH] Cert: [ATTACH] Genuine: [ATTACH]
:D: [ATTACH]
Yes, and he claimed he didn't understand what that meant. He stated "someone" told him they were genuine and it looked just like a slabbed PCGS...
The seller of the 1872's ended the auctions on my note and plead ignorance; he then sent me images of this one and said he had three of them:D,,,...
Many of the really deceptive ones that made it into TPG holders had "mistakes" made by the counterfeiters that showed how poor Numismatists they...
Wish all were this easy- the rarer no motto variety:D... [ATTACH]
I realize I am like the grim reaper of the coin Hobby, but as long as the Chinese company is able to continue to do business there is no end in...
The link I posted was removed.
[ATTACH]
Interesting; shows sold in this link:...
I would not start there- I would research it a bit myself and have a better understanding of what I was going to have slabbed... Does the edge...
Uh, no:D... [ATTACH] I wouldn't speculate on what that is, other than it looks like it could be a 1796 obverse...
I did read your post; "any advice" to me would include attributing it 1st. I see no point in even attempting to show an image if you think it has...
WOW, and now "10 available"... [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
