By the photos looks evey bit MS to me, and better than 60. If it's been cleaned, let's hope it's insignificant enough plus with age to pass, if...
Personally, I believe any vote for "details" (a vote to essentially trash an otherwise fine, legitimate coin) is a BIG part of what's wrong with...
It's one of only three or four similar unplanned/unscheduled times or events that I can recall exactly where I was and what I was doing when I...
Yes and no. For truly "details" coins...and there are some...indeed should be more to the what/where it is, as applicable. But IMO there are far...
If AU, likely no better than 50...more EF to me.
B
To be specific, Newport Beach, in "the O.C." (Orange County)...about an hour south of LA proper...maybe 20-30 mins from the LA county line. It's...
Nice, and with very even wear and rims on both sides...likely re-released somehow more recently...hasn't been making the rounds since '36 by any...
The head has differences as well, even when well-worn. Type-1s have a tail-like cap, or spike to the rear of the head/hair...maybe it's a cap but...
A tank of gas...maybe (no foolin')...my older SUV has a 42-gallon tank.
Doesn't...or didn't...the ANA in ANACS stand for American Numismatic Association when they were their official graders, or in some sort of...
And I as well, for the similar reasons in part of few "collectors" today other than those mostly youth/younger and beginners who think numis is...
A beauty of a reverse as so many are, but this one is extra-nice IMO. Oh, and while it may be "the old green holder"...it's not THE old(est)...
Well, I don't see anything else except: Don't over think this.
A 65 reverse to be sure, but honestly, believe fortunate to grade overall 64...the obverse is just 63 to me. Still, a beauty CC.
It's not just the USPS...it's many things of business both public and private...many too big for their britches, terribly mismanaged/broken...
emerald green $ sign, bold, about a 18-font a small red 2, about a 6-font
63
You've piqued my curiosity...totally in the dark with this...what is this "screening technology" at the mint...some sort of laser or infra-red...
You can always change it, but I like the 1892 and the 1982...also the 1926 plus the others suggested. Not sure the 2026 will be anything great to...
Separate names with a comma.
