raw
I like your shot of the 1916 Lincoln more than the TrueView :)
$0.00
XF-Details, cleaned
If the I in "LIBERTY" has a full lower-left serif, it is not the variety.
I sold this mess a few months ago. Brought more than I expected. Perhaps someone could enlighten me on the stamp's origin... *cough* Bruce? :D...
Long gone are the days of finding $5 face in '64 Kennedies in those boxes. It's just not worth the time anymore. If I can't find at least 2 90%...
Can't grade it properly from your pics. If you based your purchase off of those pics and those pics only, I'm sorry to say you have fallen victim...
I'm pretty sure the OP post elsewhere saying it graded 65+FB
Keep it in the cellophane and make sure it doesn't puncture. Then there won't be any question about the toning's originality. ;) Very pretty...
1810 O.109, R3. Raw and original as can be :) [ATTACH][ATTACH]
Was the coin preserved in ground near the San Andreas fault? :p Very neat half cent, Matt!
1807 O.113 "Small Stars" variety [ATTACH][ATTACH]
Looked abnormally glossy from the first set of pics, so I voted "Genuine". Second set of pics tell a different story. I think it'll grade. I'm...
Very nice 1821, Collector1966! Right up my ally :)
Or is it just me? :rolleyes: Whatever the case, I hope it's fixed soon. I'm sure Peter and his team are on top of things. :thumb: And to keep...
Looks full MS to me, but tighter close-ups would be nice... And do I see a mintmark?
Thanks, Rusty. Too bad that 3 ain't a 4 (1817/4) though, huh? :D [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1817/3 O.101, R3 with some pretty toning :) [ATTACH][ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That's a great coin, Rusty! I love the massive die crack at 3 o'clock on the late die-state, and your example looks very original :)
Separate names with a comma.
