Yes, it's a greaser but, realistically, not worth a premium. I'd still keep it, though :)
Looks undergraded :D
If you're talking about the edge, then yes, that's how it's supposed to look.
I put them in the same category as the "reverse proofs", because (correct me if I'm wrong) the same technology is used to produce the "enhanced...
Greg, that was my guess from the start... just sayin' :) I know I didn't guess the cert # Sorry to hear it didn't grade. Something about it just...
No, it is not the DDO, and it doesn't appear to be any minor DDO either.
Yes, it appears to have a full head. Your pics suggest either a high-AU or low-MS example. I cannot narrow it further w/out better pics.
UNC-Details, cleaning
It is a repunched date, meaning the date was hubbed twice into the working die... or at least I believe it was the working die, because if it were...
I see nothing keeping it from grading 66
That is cool! Apparently 1990 is a scarcer 90's date w/ dual denom errors. I handled an NGC 65 ... or maybe it was 66... sometime last year and it...
Any way you could relay his comments here? I'd like to hear his explanation...
Mind posting a link to this "Yahoo group"? I'd like to hear what others are saying, thanks.
Interesting theory. I was thinking something along those lines. The obverse die was not in the chamber, or perhaps malfunctioned, leaving only...
I think you're right... but where's evidence of a third strike on the obverse? :confused:
Who knows! I'm still examining this thing and just can't wrap my mind around it. I showed your pics to an associate here at the shop and was...
Very strange indeed. Perhaps counterfeit dies? But it looks too legit! If not, just looking at the obverse, it appears to have been struck once...
It's a detached lamination
Probably, just for the details, but I'd buy at as an XF if I were purchasing it raw.
VF-Details, Whizzed :D ... kidding. But that is one flat Walker, but I do not believe it caused by grease in the chamber.
Separate names with a comma.
