This one is thick! Interesting design: [IMG]
I did actually laugh out loud when you posted your previous two coins. You complained that my photos were dark, then you post those pathetic...
Envy? You don’t even own 80% of the coins you post. You copy juiced photos from other websites. What’s there to be envious of? Puh-lease....
You’re the one throwing a hissy fit. Pathetic. Sad sad sad. You sure do take everything about your precious coins personally. Get over it.
Here are a few of mine: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
It’s called experience.
Lovely coin. These came packaged in velvet lined cases with some foam on the lid. Apparently imparting some nice toning on a lot of them.
A certain person here doesn’t like to hear facts. Those pics are nothing like what the coin looks like in hand under normal light. Idk who is...
I like this one: [IMG]
:hilarious:
I love the Owls, but they are overpriced. I have always wanted one - they are available everywhere in most any condition - but way more than they...
I think NCLT is a more common acronym. Non Circulating Legal Tender.
I'd put the Jeff at 5.4, but those pics look like majorly juice-o-matic!
Agree with @Chris B : so long as you like it at the price you were willing to pay that’s all that really matters.
I couldn’t give two spits what NGC calls it, that doesn’t make it right. Open a dictionary.
I’d say you paid pretty strong money for it. Was it a BIN or an actual auction?
Where are we going? Someone of your “sophistication” should know better than to make blanket statements as you did, and should know that...
Provenance is the correct word, not pedigree. Unless you know of someone who has spawned the coins in their collection. Precision in language is...
[IMG]
Pedigree (or more appropriately provenance) is irrelevant for scoring. The toning should speak for itself.
Separate names with a comma.
