Sorry for my late response. I was getting ready for bed at the time of your reply. The camera is a sony cyber shot. It pretty much sucks,other...
Clash doesn't seem to line up.[ATTACH]
Title pretty much sums it up. Any thoughts are appreciated![ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This nickel is strange to me for sure. The thing that makes it unusual is the raised lines inside the door of Monticello also in the field, But...
The obverse anomaly is recessed and does have ridges. It also shows no signs of material built up around the anomaly ie dremel tool. I found it...
I appreciate it. If you look at the third pic, You can see the anomaly the best. Or the peeling for lack of a better word.
Worth saving?
I'm more interested in this area.[ATTACH]
Right. I was mentioning my experience with the newer nickels. I have plenty of the older style nickels with single sided clashes.
Also the most curious part to me.IS why isn't there any sings of the clash on the obverse? All newer nickel clashes I've seen have always had a...
I don't know. It is a very intriguing coin.
Is this a nickel? What year?
Sweet! I can finally check that off my want list!
This is the weaker of my now two Sac clashes. But you can see the U in Unum on the obverse,as well as part of one of the feathers on her sleeve...
The coin on the left appears to be the large S to me. What say you? Any thoughts are appreciated![ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The reverse under Monticello is definitely a clash, The odd thing is the right eye. Looks like a struck through to me. What say you? Any thoughts...
The MM looks like material is laying over top of it. It was pretty difficult to picture. The MM is defined and doesn't look like a hit. Almost...
To me, Any nickel that has seen circulation is rare to have the FS designation!
Looks like it might be "FS Full Steps".
The only way to tell the 40 reverse is on either side of the steps on Monticello. Your coins have lost all traces of this detail.
Separate names with a comma.
