GDJ I am not sure if that is necessarily true on some types of coins, but may be different for gold. I don't know. Even so, I've seen many graded...
XF-45+ sounds about right, and it doesn't look outright cleaned/AT to me or anything. Might have been dipped at one point, though IMO. Many...
That quarter looks MUCH better now.
AU details, cleaned. Value on ebay $200, maybe slightly over. It's a somewhat better date coin, but you're not going to get $450 for it (no...
Neither have I about the XF, I think that's AU too.... As I said on the other forum Johnny, great coin!
VF-35/XF-40 or so details Looks polished or whizzed from pics : (
Both look cleaned from the pictures, XF+ details on the quarter IMO.
Thats probably fine, even if its $2 over or something....
I agree that the overall grade besides the upper obverse is better than G, probably VG, but the surfaces do look a bit grainy.
I had no idea that that was PCGS' official position; though I have seen a lot of slabbed coins with a big difference in wear on each side (think...
I couldn't use Acetone on the dog, so I just had to do good ol' soap and water. It was pretty hard to get decent pics of the SLQ, because...
Thank you. Both are in slabs, the 1891 is MS-63, and the 1924 is MS-65 FH.
Lol! I'd say the dog has golden toning, it's not quite blast white. She does bark quite a bit though, and that result in a 'GENUINE' grade.
The cat looks like its been lightly cleaned
:d
[img] [img] [img] [img] [img] [img]
Its a really really nice coin though, and definitely not AU lol
I see no reason why it wouldn't be 66, but some have a point that the toning might cover up a bit more than would be ordinarily seen.
I'd love something like an 1872-S quarter in well circulated condition.
According to my local dealer, both rules apply. Meaning that the lowest side generally takes the grade, but because obverses carry more weight, a...
Separate names with a comma.
