It is? I have been looking at the wrong coin for varieties. I guess that coin is a keeper by accident.
:facepalm: I know that! I don’t know why I did that. Thanks for all of the replies. Just thought it was odd.
1982-D cent where Lincolns head does not appear to be fully formed. His eye and nose kinda fade onto the field instead of being a strong line....
You can really see the clash on both sides. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Sorry, took a while to find it again. [ATTACH]
Oh, well now I’m jealous. :)
First time coming across this and I cannot remember what the error is called. It has double reeding on one side of the Obverse. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
I had to look what what that was. Thank you all for the response.
I know it wasn't struck though a cactus, but the texture sure looks like it. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Friend of mine found some coins in his dads stuff. Here is the first of them. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
No glue [ATTACH]
I think it looks much better then a VF30. You can still see the beard in mine and more hair details. There are no major scratches and all letters...
What do you think this one is worth? Not the VDB [ATTACH] [ATTACH] :(
1937-D Mercury Dime[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
similar to this one, but other due markers don’t match. [ATTACH]
Here is a normal one to compare it to. [ATTACH] VS. [ATTACH] I know it isn't much, but there is something extra there.
Visible, even without magnification. The C looks like it has a unicorn horn.[ATTACH]
Came across this 1943 Steel cent that looks like it has an extra eyelid, however I cannot find one listed with the same die markers (most notably...
I was thinking feeder too, but wouldn't those be visible the entire length and not fade in and out?
I would strongly disagree with that. Zinc blisters are much more rounded and random. You can clearly see these markings are stamped, squared off,...
Separate names with a comma.
