And how did the TPG decide a "BB-304":D? Recent Bay listing: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Description: [ATTACH] Genuine (image...
Saw your post on CU; seller ended the listing. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I agree; a very counterfeited series, and I own several for research.
An interesting 1892-O Morgan; 1st images look more like a painting... [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] I understand the coin is coming back from the...
Yea, type 1; I'll do some searching when I have a minute, just hoped someone here new off the top. That MM spacing/ location doesn't exist on any...
Currently listed on the Bay- reverse appears to match both a bad 1877 and 1878 CC: [ATTACH] Obverse: [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
No images posted so I had to chuckle at this one... [ATTACH]
Good eye! [ATTACH]
Different seller, 2nd example this week... [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Listing was removed. [ATTACH]
My previous Coin Week article on this "family" of counterfeits:...
Agreed, the subject coin is a pretty bad counterfeit in comparison to either genuine examples. Continuing the attribution yields this image:...
I always start a review with attribution: [ATTACH]
Double edged sword, and I have a couple examples where they improved their "product" likely as a result of my written articles. So, we attribute...
Separate names with a comma.
