Just got the coin back and it really is a beauty. I can see why only CAM, but it looks like a 68 . There's something going on with PCGS.[ATTACH]
This is probably my last submission with PCGS. It cost a fortune, took forever, and then came back with grades like this: [ATTACH] How is this...
64+
65
fake, weird wear cast marks on reverse
[ATTACH]
Sorry, haven't received coins back from PCGS, so trueview only: [ATTACH]
This one was $40, but it included the rest of the proof set: [ATTACH]
I like this one, but thought it would be interesting to see what other people thought. I know it's nothing spectacular, but quick poll to see if...
It's an accented hair, so it's interesting that it picks up the serif in the photo. In hand it's not there.
Well, it's missing the serif but it got a couple of extra hairs so I guess it evens out. I can't believe no one saw the accented hair!
So I didn't know they have different techniques depending on the coin. Some of the pictures look totally different and not that good, like this...
Why not do a compare and contrast with the other GTG: [ATTACH]
Finally got this back, pretty much what people expected. It graded PR67 CAM It looks like a 68 to me. [ATTACH]
So I finally got the grades and trueviews from my submission back after over a month (with regular service), so I thought I'd do some guess the...
Here's my two UDM Morgans. There's no luster at all, only mirrors.[ATTACH]
Yeah I think this is one of the rare occasions Dave is wrong. UDM is a different ballgame altogether.
it's jokes!
It would look something like this: [ATTACH]
holy crap that is an unbelievable coin
Separate names with a comma.
