OUCH! Someone stamped them! That'll hurt the value! It's like tearing the note in half, essentially.
I notice that Morgandude has a high expectation of a coin having luster. Most likely because he has too many high grade UNC morgans. :D
:yes:
Is that uncirculated?
Thanks. But, I have a question, do fingerprints show up on "handled" ancients?
Si! Es un clipped planchet!
[ATTACH]Monster toner, cherrypicked from the shop. Not hard, since they know too little to differentiate a PL from a polished coin.
Guys, what happened to the golden rule of collecting, "Always Hold a coin by the edge?"
It should be Leninade![ATTACH]
Cool pickup though!
AG-details, not enough skirt lines.
No offense intended. I think it is cleaned because of the light, almost pinkish red color.
Looks possibly cleaned. Ms-60 details. WAY TOO MANY NICKS AND MARKS around for a 65.
[ATTACH] I have circled the very large ad distracting mark. It is pf 66, I know it is a pattern, but is it overgraded?
Excessively cleaned, I wouldn't touch that thing if my life depended on it.
shuddershudder!
[ATTACH] Close, but no cigar!
Nice
1974 s PF-60 DCAM details damaged and impaired 1987 PF-58 DCAM details impaired
Try dripping acetone onto the problem areas on the reverse. If that doesn't work, then leave it as it is. Nice coin :)
Separate names with a comma.