The Chapmans are far superior to the Zerbes, and have more Proof characteristics. the Zerbes are not really proofs, but Specimen strikes, or so it...
Ah yes, the Zerbe and Chapman 1921 Morgans. Examples are known with and without an "S" mintmark. The story goes that Zerbe visited the Mint,...
I see wear and rub, but it is an AU 58. No offense intended, but really, I dislike the services for their brutal overgrading of rare type coins...
I like it though, because it has nice even wear for a coin of its type.
Yipes, I suck at grading these half eagles! I gave it a G-4!!!!!!! because I did not see enough hair on the top of the coronet and the rims on the...
Its not a defect, it's dust.
Need some help on taking coin pics and want to ask the experienced photographers about editing and making coins look as good as possible in a...
Good advice Tom. I agree, don't submit coins until you get a bit more experience, as you might lose money in the process.
Looks OK, I think it is AU 50 now (details). What head type is it? 1793, 1794, or 1795?
I said MS. MS-55!:devil:
Really? I thought that they were placed in the soft packs, the "non-uncirculated" (by GSA standards at least) ones.
Sorry! Not great with values.
I like! Very nice pickup!
Oh. Whoops.
BigTee44 is correct. Looks like choice AU to me. (AU53) If it is authentic, we're talkin' 25,000 plus!
Please do not hold your coins like that. It will case ugly fingerprints to develop. Also, DO NOT CLEAn COINS. It would help if better pics that...
Wait... Are you saying that the GSA DIPPED the CC dollars?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Corrosion is a strong, strong word in the coin world. It refers to deep toning/excessive pitting deeper than the surface that cannot be removed...
I'm going to sue you for blinding me. :devil: Good photos, and awesome coins.
I DON"T HAVE THE COIN!!!!!!!!! I'm only 11, I couldn't afford a 40,000 dollar coin!
Separate names with a comma.
