Just my 2 cents.
Yes, because the piece displays both wear and a weak strike.
It is not authentic. WAY too mushy.
1857: AG-3 details, details, pitting 1859: G-6 details, what is that yellow stuff? 1862: G-4 details damage 1863 G-6 1864 G-6
Reminds me of when I started collecting, calling AU Pres. dollar coins high MSs.
Just in time for spring cleaning!:D
MS-64. Toning is unsightly. The toning is all that keep it from gem in my opinion. Nice coin.
Not a proof.
Lol!
I haven't read much about the milk spots that appear on these coins occasionally, but from what I've read, it seems like the proofs aren't...
Au-58
Hope you don't mind me asking, but what grade is that Lincoln? Great coins!
Au-55.
That's called haze. It's considered unattractive, and would lower the grade, so it's not worth certifying.
It's a Nixon cent, a novelty coin. Google it.
That reminds me, I was in my coin shop, and I saw the Botanic Coin&Currency commem set. for about $40!!! I knew it was a steal, an instant 100...
AU-55, details, I see definite wear, and the luster is WAY too weak to be untouched, along with the white color. ( Pardon me please if you think...
And proud of it!:D
PR- details, the toning is way too dark, and might be corrosion.
EXACTLY my point.
Separate names with a comma.
