Read this - Click Here
Yup, and this not the first - spent the predecessors. I've been carrying one of these for years. And no, I don't lose things.
If memory serves, on the '72 cent you said it would bag for altered surfaces.
My guess would be that PCGS was correct.
The acqusition of knowledge.
Just about everybody who was trying to talk to you about it. Dipping and cleaning are entirely different things. Which I tried to explain to you...
Short memory in your old age Mike ? :D This is my pockey piece -
Yup, very well known as a legend in his own mind :whistle:
spock, really - you do need to seek professional help :rolleyes:
It is every year - because you pay your membership fees every year.
Understand, but I doubt breaking them out will stop the haze from getting worse. They can be easily replaced, so why not do so before it gets too bad.
The supposedly gold is absolutely not authentic.
And THAT is the point. Aging is natural, and with aging comes toning. And toning does not always mean color, in fact color is the exception rather...
Forget the coins from the El Cazador. Every single one of them is badly corroded and in very bad shape - every one ! Also overpriced, particularly...
Read this thread - Click Here And this thread about originality - HERE
Hardly spock, the coin to which I refer was under 30 kilos if memory serves. And there was only 1 - not 2. However, should you ever be about...
By including altered coins any key in any denomination has to rank towards the top and I would agree with previous answers. But probably the...
Surprisingly enough, a great many collectors do exactly that. They seem to equate originality with how the coin looked the moment it came off the...
I'd have to say 62, too many heavy marks on the cheeks to get a 63. You paid 62 money for it.
In all honesty, it appears to be a cast fake.
Separate names with a comma.
