The item dated 1800 is not a genuine coin. It was probably intended to be a fake Bust dollar, since there are no bust halves dated 1800, but it's...
That's machine doubling. Quite common for 1922. Typically shows up on the nose, neck, and date. It doesn't figure into the attribution.
Looks close. If not quite PL, maybe get a star for trying from NGC. AU55, perhaps? It was probably dipped to attempt to get rid of the black...
You would probably get at least 110% of hammer (e.g., coin hammers for $1M, you get $1.1M, buyer pays $1.175M) on that coin with either Heritage...
It sold for $57,200 (including the vig) back in 1982. Eliasberg bought it in 1942 as part of the Clapp collection, which he bought for $100,000....
While I have seen coins in GSA holders that were toned on both sides, they're not common. After the GSA sale, coins that found their way into...
Yes. Dahlonega closed in 1861 at the onset of the Civil War, Denver opened in 1906.
Picked up a nice 44-O in PCGS 45. It goes nicely with the rest of the set. [IMG]
63. VAM 10.
Some form of environmental damage, perhaps. Two coins in contact with each other, one with some chemical on it in the fieldsame like an intaglio...
If it were tilted that slightly, you'd never notice anything amiss with the reeds. If the reeds were tilted (they're not), and they were tilted...
PCGS will not designate PL for business strikes of these that happen to be prooflike (or for any other PL coin that isn't a Morgan dollar), but...
Separate names with a comma.
