I have seen average condition steel cents sell for fifty cents or so, but yours is pretty rough. The 1944 is even worse so I would say face value...
Post some pictures of your coins and someone will be glad to help. If your "1776" coin matches the one in this thread though, it is a fake.
It is more common than you would expect. With the billions of cents around they have suffered damage in almost every conceivable way.
Who certified it? It isn't in a slab.
I don't see any error, just a normal well worn walking liberty half.
Just a normal 1990 cent, worth, one cent.
The rear penny? I think you'll have to be a bit more specific! Welcome to the forum!
Not worn or damaged, the zinc would be showing through if it was.
Like the others I only see a normal corroded quarter. Virtually no chance it is struck on a silver Canadian quarter. Anxiously awaiting edge...
Small date 1982 cents are very common and worth face value. It is the copper small date 1982 D that is valuable.
Looks like a plating blister.
Looks to be an old English coin. I believe it to be a George II halfpenny or farthing .
Sounds like your coin is just damaged. If it is bent it didn't happen during striking, it could not bend while in the dies. Pictures would help.
Simply a Philadelphia minted coin. Philadelphia did not use mint marks, except on the 1942 to 1945 war nickels, until much later.
I would put it in the low VF range. Really nice looking coin but I would not consider getting it graded.
Looks like the F didn't strike up well, either from die polishing or filled die. Nothing too unusual.
Agreed, just a normal coin with environmental damage.
Can you post a picture of the other coin?
That coin is a large date. No value above one cent, but welcome to the forum!
I am not sure what you are asking. Do you see something on this coin that you think is an error?
Separate names with a comma.
