They all look like VAM 5A.
Do we know that the hammer and anvil die weren't switched with the reverse design change?
The seller even states he's been told that it's an 1823 but is selling it as a '22 since that's how he bought it. I'm just wondering where these...
I just spent a couple minutes looking at the designs. I want my couple minuntes back.
64PL for me. The fields look pretty clean. The marks on the cheek are frost-disturbing scuffs, and not bad hits.
PCGS uses published attribution guides for their definitions of varieties, as they should, otherwise they'd be inventing their own varieties (NGC...
It looks like staining from something having been glued to it at one time. It was, after all, in circulation before the GSA packaged it. Check...
I can't get past the scratch on the cheek, either. This must otherwise be absolutely stunning in hand, otherwise, I'd call it more of a PR65@#! CAM.
The first thing I would do with this coin is put it under my stereoscope at high power and try and figure out what it is. This might include...
If you're referring to the two pictures shown here, they are the same coin.
Not an O/S. Not exactly sure what happened to cause that, since I wasn't there at the time, but it's not an O/S.
Yeah, both coins are cleaned. I would put #2 in the album and sell #1, as it is still an upgrade.
Separate names with a comma.
