You and Charmy are doing a fine job of defending.
I think you are nuts to try this, but other peoples opinions have not stopped you in the past and probably won't stop this.
Got this in the Heritage news letter today; There are no pics posted for #6, but here is the pic from #8 (which should be the same coin) sold...
I do not think I am seeing any wear, just a not full strike, I will go 64 with the biggest strike being the weak rims. As we discussed that last...
I am out of my element again, but that is a real clean looking coin - real clean. Too bad it does not have a better strike. I will guess a 65?
I don't mind flattery, but you are carrying that just a little far, aren't you.
I spite of the grade, I think I would go with the 63. It has more detail than the brown. The strikes are similar, but those rims. I know I am...
I have got to get through the next couple months before I worry about that, but thanks for the invite. If I remember correctly, you are back...
I am missing what you are referring to in that article. They were not called radioactive when I took the courses 40 years ago. And, no, I was...
I assume 24 is the atomic number not the atomic weight. Still, that makes iron, silver, gold, platinum, zinc, copper and all coin metals...
At what I paid for them, I really do not think I rate very high on his list unless he wants back on eBay.
Tell me about it. Courtesy of Heritage. The others they have sold went from $200 (NGC 2005) to $500. I was expecting a not so nice coin, but it...
Maybe it was not such a great grab. Here is the sellers title tonight; : greatdealsforu2009 ( 167 [Feedback score is 100 to 499] ) [About...
In an atom smasher atom by atom. Combine yttrium and zirconium, niobium and strontium, etc.
Yes it can, but at a cost beyond belief.
62? Because it was the only other logical grade left that someone else had not guessed. Maybe it is just your missing bulb, but that coin just...
Because wear does not occur at the low points. Weak strikes etc. do.
I give. The second id 63 RB, but what is the first? 65BN? I do not think so. It looks very nice for a 62 BN.
Out of 5300 feedbacks, only the 18 withdrawn would bother me. The other 24 that count still leave him >99.5% when counting the neutral as negative.
As fro PCGS MS strikes, the earliest I can find is 2005 for Lincolns, dimes and quarters and 2007 for the nickels.
Separate names with a comma.
