So, all considered, you've only spent 27 cents?
The original post said any nickel composition is OK, so here is an 1886 3-cent nickel Proof. For some reason it's not graded as a cameo. Dunno...
New photographs. 1938-D Buffaloes. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] The bottom one was acquired from @jtlee321, which implies that it is still worse than all...
New photograph. 1937-S Buffalo. [ATTACH]
New photographs. 1937-D Buffaloes. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
New photograph. 1937 Buffalo. This one has a couple of nasty looking tiny spots, but overall is a lovely coin. You just don't notice the...
New photographs. 1936-D, 1936-S Buffaloes. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
New photographs. 1936 Buffaloes. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
New photograph. 1935-D Buffalo. [ATTACH]
New photograph. 1935 Buffalo. [ATTACH]
New photograph. 1934 Buffalo. [ATTACH]
New photograph. 1931-S Buffalo. [ATTACH]
Okay, I see where that cannot be tolerated. Not only does it have a chilling effect on open discourse, but in threatening the site itself he’s...
New photographs. 1930 Buffaloes. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Both types are the same on the front, so the reverse photo would be definitive. The first step towards better photos is just to crop away some of...
Nice purchase. I bought one similar to that and I am still really pleased that I did. I hope the same for you.
I missed the original thread but I wasn't offended by anyone but the original poster. In fact, VKB was quite polite and supportive to Shrews....
New photograph. 1929-S Buffalo. [ATTACH]
I did enjoy you two going toe-to-toe. The exchanges were well-reasoned and articulate, considering I never had to take sides. ‘Twas fun to watch.
Thanks! Not only do I like the effect, but it really helps me understand it better. The buffalo’s head, for example, looks badly worn. But the...
Separate names with a comma.
