1883 was a cool year for several varieties. I'm not seeing an error coin. It's tough to say much more about the coin from the images.
This is where I get in trouble trying to grade these. In the image, I see dullness on the high points and the right field looks interrupted in a...
From the slab image, I can agree with 55. Pretty coin.
You are evil;)
Pretty coin. I'll go with 55.
I'll go with 64 or 65.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
45
I have never agreed with the standards that the TPGs use for gold coins. To me wear is wear.
Polishing cloths will destroy the value of your coins. Polishing your coins is never a good idea.
Back to Half Cents. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'm at 53.
I'll go with 35 but would be happy with 30. Nice coin.
Some early published stuff would call a chip a cud. Over the years the rules were set that a cud must include the rims of the coin. Anyone using...
I don't ask "What's your best price" Most of my dealings are face to face. Returning coins is a pain and a waste of everyone's time. In person I...
Nice coin and dealer. He is a member here. @C-B-D
The coin would probably grade 64 or 65. Not worth the fees to get it in a respectable holder. I would take better images if trying to sell it.
It is just a damaged coin.
Separate names with a comma.
