Two Classic Commems come to mind. The (Robinson) Arkansas Centennial (1936) and The Sesquicentennial of American Independence (1926).
They are struck at private mints.
I said that OP's '60' was too baggy to grade higher. OP then stated he would start a thread with baggy examples grading higher.
My membership has lapsed..........too bad. I had such faith.
Nah, too 'baggy'. The toning helps a bit, but not to much to these old eyes......
One needs a learning curve with that stuff.
Quite right, because most of them are downright, danged, ugly coins. An '58 would appear better.
Old news. Way old news...........
Yeah, but the tick under the right eye.......that's danged distracting.
This is getting embarrassing.........
Leave 'em be..........
Send it to me.......I'll photog it for you. [ATTACH] Best of luck with the submission, JD............
Maybe, maybe not. You could crack it and soak in a bit of acetone, but I don't think that would get rid of the black. A soak in some xylene might...
It's a type of translucent paper similar to tracing paper.
I think it's better than '60' but I wouldn't crack it out and resubmit it.
OK........taped some vellum over the lights. Still three's. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Disappointed office seeker.........
[ATTACH] Don't take it personal. That's just Kurt. :)
Shoot, wouldn't that stuff dissolve the stamp? After all, the stuff eats through Styrofoam........
Extremely correct........I've the luxury have having 'live view' on the camera, so I can move lights around in real time to get the (potential)...
Separate names with a comma.
