Come on guys - I can see all of liberty and the lower head band. :) Here is a link to my favorite guide by rick snow.
I would say VF20. Nice coin at a nice price.
Here is the last one: [IMG][IMG]
Some of the newest additions - the one 1816 has a few spots and scratches, but other than that this is a nice bunch. I did get in a new IHC (1871...
I would have said F12, but what a beauty. I can see why it was VF20 by PCGS.
With #30 how can you make a reasonable offer - you would at least need to know the face value.
I can barely afford to look at F12 coin in those dates, much less purchase one. If I was you I would check with Shawn Yancey - he could probably...
I agree with conder and leadfoot - keep this nice coin raw. It looks porous and maybe re-colored, but it is still a very nice coin, much nicer...
One nice coin - I agree 64 or 65.
I think you did ok, not good, but ok. I have seen some pretty rough ones sell for 5/10 bucks on ebay. At least I do not see any signs of...
As only a buyer on ebay - I say keep the money. As far as I am concerned the buyer did not do his part - seeing the coin as not proof. Then...
Let me do some ciphering - my "edited" id says I joined in 2003, so I was 41.
Much nicer than the one I posted. I would say AU50/55. Really nice coin!
I think that is the correct grade. Nice coin!
Yeah - but it is still a nice coin! Even after all this time still no toning on the old pictures. LOL - time for me to go back to work. :)
Good deal! Nice looking coins.
There is no such thing as a bad 1799 - it might grade poor to ag, but that is not a bad thing. I want that date and the 1804(which I know I can...
From everything I have read you will not see a R/B become a brown if you take care of the coin. So from the posted example - I think you would...
Too bad - I wanted to see the 1799.
My first thought was 62 - but I would go with MS63.
Separate names with a comma.
