The 1883 V-nick looks great in there. You can get slidemarks on the reverse of the silver Washington and have them not be so noticeable, now. ;)
That'll be a nice find if it is indeed missing a clad layer and not a coin that's been acid etched or whatever.
[IMG] [IMG]
Wow. Totally would've fooled me, of course.
Less than ideal pix. Nice coin. I bought it twice, not initially realizing I had owned it before when I bought it the second time. Guess that...
Thoroughly awesome.
Got any Norway or 1814 or 1964? ;)
You can redeem yourself by playing another killer goldie WITH a date on it, as soon as the opportunity arises. :)
That one's a wild card. Norway or 1964 OR 1814!
Always loved that type.
Sorry, but this one falls afoul of the terms of the OP: (Bold emphases from the original.) Believe me, I've been tempted to break the rule...
Is that Livia at top left?
If it makes you feel any better, I no longer own that coin, so as with much of this stuff, I'm only showing off "bygones". ;) Some of my bygones...
I think you're talking about another issue. The point is, a coin WITHOUT wear CAN have been circulated. Circulation does not automatically equal...
United States: proof copper-nickel 3-cent piece, Liberty head type, 1888 [IMG] [IMG]
Gee... ya think so? LOL Stork gets the "Mistress of Understatement" title for the day. Sweet original looking 1833 CBH for ... junk silver?...
Yes. This is why the old, confusing term "Uncirculated" is something of a misnomer, and used less often now, having been replaced by the term...
Here is a lot of 32 German Imperial (Kaiserreich) minor-denomination coins; 1- 2- and 5-pfennig pieces from the late 1800s. All are in 2x2...
Separate names with a comma.
