Oh, good heavens. Sorry, but that's a nasty, corroded wreck. Even if it were an error, it would be worthless in that condition.
Please do.
Otho at #121 was the second-scarcest ruler I've had, I think. [IMG]
I think Pupienus at #129 on the list was as rare a ruler as I've achieved. For years, I thought the pictures of it were lost, but then I...
Well, if it's not a barbarous imitation, the answer can be found in their history. By the 5th century, as they neared their fall, the quality of...
Opinion? It's pretty, but as @V. Kurt Bellman mentioned in a snarky but hilarious way, it's still a 1964 nickel. They made a little over one...
Merged the duplicate threads.
Given that much of the unaffected area on the coin appears to be Mint State with original luster, I'm leaning towards the messed-up portion of the...
My guess would be... [IMG]
Common, but nice. They're a fun series. Sounds like you're making good progress, too. PS- your pix aren't bad at all. Like most of my own...
A 1943 cent is supposed to be magnetic.
It looks like damage to me, but I suppose there's a possibility that could be a lamination. I'll defer to those with more error coin experience.
Pretty.
The one in the OP appears to be a modern copy (sort of) of a medal struck in 1882 for the centennial of the Great Seal. I can't find pics of one...
Sorry, I've got nothing for you (not my cuppa tea) - but I will say that I like your "mountain" avatar picture. :)
Not an error at all. Damaged, as Paddy mentioned.
Yes, pocket change in this condition. Face value.
No, it's not a 2-pfennig, because those were copper. It's a 5-pfennig piece, struck in copper-nickel (note the whiter color). They also struck...
Yep. It's a 1924. Desirability is diminished somewhat by the environmental damage (discoloration), so worth less than a buck as-is. Still, it...
Barbarous imitation, maybe?
Separate names with a comma.
