Kevin I'm really sorry to hear about the theft. Numismatic theft can be reported here: Numismatic Crime Information Center...
A more run-of-the-mill example, a 15-Y: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Club rays: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
just over 2d left and bidding up to 450!
Somebody else want to try "contact seller" and see if they can get a message through?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/114976249631?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649 A really terrible fake 73-cc which I have...
Impressive, some very tough coins there, especially the first 3. Great job on the type set!
Great story, thanks for posting
Looking at the reverse, it appears to me that someone dipped the coin in a silver cleaner, then went after the more darkly tarnished areas with an...
Great looking coin! Amazing that there are still some of these old proofs out there that haven't been slabbed yet.
The OP mentioned having trouble spotting the rubbed areas; I like to hold the coin level under an incandescent, LED or xenon light, then tilt the...
Here is my 1857, an AU58: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
beautiful crusty half. Nice addition to the harem.
Well, okbc, if you're going slumming with the low neckline and clingy negligee', you could do far worse. I love those 1840's halves!
Beautiful coin but that mark is in the exact spot to keep it from 65, imo
Nice, lots of detail.
I like the op's coin, the rim dings don't bother me as they are relatively smooth and toned in. Nice coin that escaped attempts at "improvement."...
I'm terrible at grading from photos, especially Morgans, so will just opine that both are very choice and great looking!
Happy anniversary!
I think I like the photo presentation more than the coin. Still, it appears genuine from the photos, cleaned, with some rim damage.
Separate names with a comma.
