My score on this Jeff is a 3.0. I knew @Lehigh96 would hate it - because of the colors involved. I have a 2nd coin, same year, same date, same...
Sometimes when I post photos here I think they must be compressing them or doing something a bit odd to them - they often show up a bit fuzzier...
Nope, no wear...
I recently acquired this beautiful little silver minor from a member on the PCGS forums. It arrived yesterday, and I thought it might be a fun...
Beautiful coin. I see that it is imaged now. [IMG]
This should be interesting: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Chemistry experiment...gack.
A new addition to my horse set - [IMG]
Love that token @Jaelus !
Would you not agree that the Simpson example of the 1895 Proof Morgan for sale on Heritage is more attractive than the PF66 example you posted?...
Why do you take everything so personally? That 1895 Morgan proof is hairlined, it is not fully struck, and the toning is not anything spectacular...
I do not like that coin at all. It has a lot of hairlines on the face, and the toning is completely underwhelming.
Often, proofs may have some thin film optical beauty, but the mirrors of the proof hide the colors. On non-proof coins, the frosty luster...
I just wanted one per date. I don’t really consider the two variants of the 1852 to be a high priority.
The Bank of Upper Canada token halfpennies (and pennies) were issued to help with a severe coin shortage in provincial Canada. The tokens were...
I'm at a 4.8. The mint-set toned Jeff proofs are not super rare, but they sure are beautiful.
Gorgeous coin. I've had a couple of those on my watch lists over the past years - but never pulled the trigger. You got an amazing example....
I have a Jeff Nickel, whenever the floor is open.
Beautiful coin @johnmilton ! Could you post the rest of the set here too?
Found On Road Dead :D
Separate names with a comma.