Bit of a hassle, but done!
I really hope that it's real.... but I doubt it. Check out how large the "ONE" is on yours, and how it's the same size as "DOLLAR" on the PCGS...
Nope, didn't call 'em, just used "Report this listing" or some such interactive link.
AU50 sounds about right to me.
[img]
I reported the seller. Paypal's money back guarantee is going to go into overdrive with this character.
And yet, with a feedback score of -1, people bid? Sheep begging to be led by the wolf to slaughter!
Perhaps, but in my opinion, it would be a waste of money. I don't see much "back and forth" seems overwhelmingly fake. The 3 looks like it was...
I don't know, maybe I'm just becoming suspicious in my old age but.... The one on the left is from the NGC site and the other is your pic. Date...
Seeing this reminds me of an observation that I made long ago, but had forgotten. IMO, the coin designs from before the requirement to include "E...
Man, that's extraordinary! What do you think would keep it from being a 65? Is that a rim bump at 12:00? Maybe just a hint of wear on the bear's...
Kinda like a medal that you can spend! Of course we could spend our ASEs for a buck, I guess. "Hey Pop, lend me $30?" "Sure son, here's an AGE for...
Thank you. Appears to be quite easily seen.
Wow, a bunch. Say, could you post a picture of the obverse & reverse? I was curious to see how discernible the clashes are without magnification.
UFL - the post that Monica longed for :cat:!
I believe that you're right. The eyes aren't depicted correctly. At any rate, they look odd. Even so, I'll get the Coin & Chronicles sets :D....
nearest I (Google) found was this: [img] Netherlands East Indies plantation token for 5 liters of rice ca. 1911-1916. Let's see what others come...
Well, if the technology to counterfeit is improving, let's hope that the technology to detect counterfeits is improving more.
I also like the coin, but what's going on in the forehead and cheek? Gimme a 63.
eye appeal plus!
Separate names with a comma.
