Not a proof
Pass, there are better coins at lower prices out there. Be patient in finding the right coin for your collection.
That was struck by a Die that should have been replaced a long time ago.
Worn but it looks like the large one.
The left one looks to have s lamination error as pointed out. The left one also appears to be the poor man's Doubled Die. The last 5 looks Doubled...
The coloring is different and in the PCI holder is should cross but it doesn't look like a 65 to me. 64 yes.
Hard to say what caused that so I'd toss it aside and keep it until a further determination can be made.
Thank you for featuring this.
It looks more like an S over a D but it's really just a damaged mintmark. The D mintmark took a hit.
Not a chance!
I have the same problem Randy.
This is a neat little token of William Penn and Pennsylvania's Bicentennial. It was struck in 1882 by the US Mint in Philadelphia. It's brass, 25...
A great find!
Errors? Where?
Do yourself a favor and return it. It's an ugly coin and a very poor example of Lady Liberty.
How long has it been since 1964? Over 56 years. How many collectors and other people have been pulling out silver coins in thst time frame?...
To answer your question: Machine Dublin also known as MD or mechanical doubling, shift doubling, or shift doubling is not caused by the die...
MD or machine doubling. It's very common. It's worth one cent.
Hopefully the OP learned from all this and got a nice laugh. It's damaged and not a mint error. Welcome to CT.
Nice looking for its age but normal in all aspects that I can see. The rim is off a bit but that is also normal. Welcome to CT.
Separate names with a comma.
