These types of coins are considered Colonial coins as they freely circulated in this land before we became a country. There are Connecticut Copper...
That's what I was told by the seller, a very reputable dealer. I love Colonial coins but I don't know very much about them.
I don't mind at all. Nice looking coin you have there and I can relate to the lower prices.
I'm missing that date.
Are you referring to the MD on the coin? If so, it's quite common, especially on proofs.
400x? If you can't see it with a 10x it doesn't exist. If you use 400x then every coin will have an error.
I said MS-67. Beautiful coin.
XF-45 but that dark color is going to hold the price back a little. Nice looking otherwise. Welcome to CT.
That's not a cud. It's a die chip andvthey are very common, especially in places like that. A cud must touch the rim. Like this one: [ATTACH]...
No need to edit the title. Justbpost the coin in the GTG thread you started as that's where everyone that respond will be looking.
You did good! :)
Thank you
Yes, the other piece I posted today is a 1786.
Very rude and inconsiderate. An apology needs to be forthcoming. Chris was simply trying to determine why you feel like you do. The same thought...
Yes it is a Connecticut copper piece.
I only said that because of the OP's thread title, "Shouldn't all proof be graded 70?" Then his post refers to his title, which was a question.
Maybe a poor choice of words but I think my point was made and this OP will not repeat this mistake again.
Of course they're worn. Only 1% or less were saved. They were needed for circulation due to the war.
Another worn coin but given its age, 232 years, it's not in bad shape. This was listed as rare, rarity 5. The second photo shows a tiny rim clip...
I'll take your word but it looks slightly raised to me in the photo.
Separate names with a comma.
