Best wishes but I think anything you do to remove the marks will permanently damage the surface of that coin. What a shame as it's very nice looking.
The coin has been spooned but they gave up making it into a ring. Now it's just damaged. Welcome to CT.
X2
My local LCS, online dealers that are well known to me, antique stores and people that come to me.
Your coin is filled with stains. This one just looks like a mintmark but it's a stain.
Afraid not
That's the difference between the two varieties, wide and close.
I have one that beats them. I paid less than that as well. I just can't post on this forum.
I'm positive that is a W quarter.
Definitely damaged
A failed attempt at making an error at home.
The real question is, if you had known what would happen to certain coins in the last 50 years, would thst have changed your collecting interest?
I voted the first Any. It was behind but I'm not seeing any doubling.
The seller is in Canada and they have 100% feedback. The photos are out of focus and the seller's similarities of other coins are not. That leads...
Two more proof Dimes, a 1960 and a 1962. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Two more proof Dimes. The left one has a slight bit of dark brown toning. A 1957 and a 1959. Not bad for a junk silver find. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Interesting
Great finds Paddy but I think you have more fun and enjoyment in what you do than in what you find. Love your finds.
One never knows what you'll find in NYC. Great finds again Paddy! Congrats
That deep dent on the obverse is more than enough to keep me from spending $20 on it.
Separate names with a comma.
