Looks flat and shelf like to me.
If I only had a crystal ball.
I’d keep it. Small date or not, it’s 61 years old and it’s decent looking.
The only D to be repunched would be the mint mark. I’m not seeing that. The rest of what you see was caused by a worn die and circulation. Nice...
Yes they are but there’s lots more. First I’d like to see if @scottishmoney can answer me about the registers signature.
I’m not an expert by any means but that’s what it looks like to me. It looks more like a lamination crack that opened up on the wheat stalk more...
That I can relate too! Lol
I’m thinking it was a planchet defect before it was minted.
Very nice. I need one in that condition. I’m thinking a MS-63 but I know very little about this series.
You’re seeing the same thing I am. I just don’t have all those neat arrows on my cell phone.
Wow!!! What a great note! Did you notice the Registers signature? If not look carefully before I tell you.
I hear that. I’m trying to obtain another CSA Note this week. I’ll let you know.
Lol
I can barely see it in hand. No way can I get photos on my cell phone. The slab from the TPG is correct from what I can see.
First time I’ve noticed that and I’m sure you are correct.
Shame about the condition. CSA Notes with trains tend to bring hunger amounts as trains are highly sought after. This one has a hand written...
You can see portion of the edge but you can’t see the errors.
I can’t imagine why
Looks like a greaser to me. Welcome to CT.
Sure looks like it to me. Am I mistaken or not but if you post coins that are not yours isn’t it polite to say so?
Separate names with a comma.
