Not a bad price, especially from the mint, $3.50. but, probably $5 shipping & handling.
:thumb:
Becky: That is because it isn't an S, it is an unusually shaped die break. My stupidity: I meant the J.
sure, hold the claw and hit it with the handle.
Ben is right, the 1834 is a pain to attribute, even if you have it in hand.
Dreamer: If it is a replica it must have "copy" under the 1973 (? not sure of the date) Hobby Protection Act. However, if it is a copy intended...
bob: Yep, it is a shame, but it was a common practice in those days. Still, a good buy for someone.
Very nice finds, keep going.
The 1899 P is a low mintage of 330,846 the 1899 O is 12,290,000 Value as an AU= 1899 P= $275 the 1899 O= $24.50 If the buyer really knew what he...
Ruben: Very nice, and congratulations.
GDJMSP: I was referring to the 'collectible' gold 'tokens' that were made in the 1870's and 1880's. Jewelers made them for the public for jewelry...
Silver Striker: I am truly shocked!!!! I never knew that SGS graded anything below MS-69 or MS-70! These are either really rare, or very ugly,...
edduns Thank you for the info, I am sure that it will help someone in the future.
Darryl: Okay, here's the bad and the good news: 1) Nope, not real. the good news: They were made of real gold, as collector items. The real...
6:30, so it has been 7 hours and still there.
I don't need this one, I already have 1/2 a roll.
The line on the bottom of the reverse (shield side) bothers me. Does anyone else think that is is funky?
DJCoins: You did very well in this controversy. I wish you luck.
Five hours, and it is still there.
Separate names with a comma.
