That is one big ouch!
Now, that would be a rarity!
I agree, AU, and yes, our first commem. half dollar.
LOL, I saw the title and was about to ask why would anyone bother to fake SGS. But your post was better. Thanks
Clembo: Nice coin, and I especially like that it ISN't the S mint coin from that year. :thumb:
Raisetown: Not a put down, but there are many reference books that will help you out with learning about cameo surfaces, and other terminology....
If you think that one is bad, look at the 1899 Proof Barber quarter, labeled PR-67. Could be a Proof 60-- maybe, in a bad light. Anyone who...
it is BU---Beat Up.
Hmmm... are you saying that the coins have the date: 90 B.C.?
cody: Nice rant.
As clembo stated, it was the buyer's decision. At least the seller was honest that it was an acid date. But........what a waste of money.
I don't think that you can possibly go wrong for $5. She's a beaut.
Here comes 2 more, thanks again. Frank P.S> Yes, I know that the 1777 is cleaned and ugly, but try to look beyond that.
Separate names with a comma.
