Three small changes can vastly improve your posts. The image, by the way, is pretty good. These ideas are just to improve the presentation of the...
I found that I wanted to click on each of the images to see them bigger. So this reaction is in the "Oh boy, I want to see even more!" category;...
1939 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1938-S [ATTACH] [ATTACH] One year down, 80 to go...
1938-D [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thanks! I fixed the typo! I'll post the D tomorrow, I expect.
I went off to buy a proof half at the LCS, but it was sold. Instead, I found a Dansco with an essentially complete set of Jefferson nickels. The...
I have been doing exactly this for several weeks. I set up an eBay search for only MS66-67’s. This is better than any 66 I have seen come up. At...
I interpret the definitions differently. In the period ending in 1817, a Specimen has a particular definition. Outside that period, it was a term...
[ATTACH]
What is the story, I wonder, behind a circulated Commemorative? In 1926, this was a new issue and sold for $1.00. As such, you would expect it to...
Very, distinctly, blue. Hard to capture. [ATTACH]
The red toning across the face makes this a beauty for only $12. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1985-S Proof [ATTACH]
Put a piece of masking tape over the grade, ignore their opinion, and get back to enjoying the coin for what it is.
I think the arrows are a pretty good idea, actually, and some description to go along with it would complete the package. For example, if you...
1984-S Proof. Overall quality has improved, with the reverse showing steps and more details of Lincoln‘s statue. The fields show heavy rippling...
@Dave Waterstraat I agree. The subtle hint of color really brings the coin to life. [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
