Wouldn’t that mean we have to re-evaluate all the mint reports back through 1909? In the meantime I’ll try to corner the market on all high-end...
This is not a perfect 1972-S proof. There are, however, some interesting toning effects. The reverse is almost uniformly toned with a layer of...
I gave up and ordered a new 1969-S proof to replace the one in my last post. I'll show it off when I get it. It was only a couple of bucks, so I...
I probably should replace this 1969 proof, but I like the color. But that blob on the reverse looks terminal to me. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
@BadThad, those are some nice 1967's! With 1968 the Mint restarted the Proof program. The minting of proofs was moved to the San Francisco mint,...
1967 marked the third, and final, year where the mint produced only Special Mint Sets in lieu of proofs. The 1965 and 1966 examples I have just...
$20.50 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I was inspired to try an experiment. I have a number of 70s, 80s, and 90s Lincoln proofs that have fingerprints. I envision the prior owner...
I am no longer "lacking only 1904". My small 1900-1909 set is complete. Hmmm, what next... [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
