yup, I remember them. In fact, I have a few of them -- somewhere.
and a really neat off center!
Same here, on Long Island. No bullion at all.
okay, where is the picture of the coin? (silly boy, as is, I'd say: R-9, non-existant.)
Just wait until Clembo sees these!
interesting, and at $2.01, you got a deal, under silver. :thumb:
Freaky: The 1893 Token is from the 1892/3 Columbian Expo. It is a common piece, and comes with both large & small lettering on the obverse....
It is not the 'biggie' it doesn't match the one listed in Wexler/Flynn's guide of "the Best of the Washington Quarter Doubled Die varieties."
That looks like the one! Nice find, however, don't trust Breen's estimates of mintages. He was known for just making up 'facts' whenever he...
#1: Welcome to the forum; #2: You are not making a fool of yourslef, the only fools are those who assume and don't ask questions. #3: Most...
both post mint damage. no added value, in fact, worth less.
strike doubling or die erosion. (pictures are not clear enough to be sure which one it is.) No premium. Common.
aka: die chatter. one of the dies (usually the hammer die) was loose.
This is the best reply of his: "Q: what if you have 1 with no mint? THANKS Oct-29-08 A: 1956 with no mint means Philadelphia and is not...
Lol.
I lose. Oh, well.
Recklessop Yup, machine doubling. Aka: Ejection doubling and other names.
could also be old PVC contamination.
I just HAVE to enter! Thanks, Indianhead!
Toad: Nice, but I have to ask: On that 1795, considering the condition, how can you ID the Cohen variety? Or is it just luck and a very...
Separate names with a comma.
