A definite candidate for an AU-59.5.
hmmmmmmmmmmm.... no comment, at this time.
NOW-- This is cool! Great find, and unusual to have both pieces. Esp on a circ piece.
excellent pictures, I have read about these, but never seen one in person. nice catch. Did you cherrypick it?
ppratt: Nice piece, and sure it could be better condition, you could have gotten an MS-63, but then it could have been better with an MS-65....
Good luck with the QX-5, I have a 3 and enjoy it. Back to the pix: #1= strike doubling, but, more interesting look at the mark below & between...
To all: I would have said the same thing: post mint damage possibly from a coin counter. But-- look at the date, there is no raised metal...
most likely greased die. That said, it is strange that it is so straight!
BY, George, I think he's got it.
huh? worm? on further thought, I believe post mint.
A little light, but nice separation.
sorry, but to my poor eye they all appear to be AT.
yup, read it, and he was crying about the guy who ripped HIM off! Funny.
The obverse looked damaged. But, the reverse?
Interesting, I'd send it in to a real third party grader.
sleepers: Semi-key Barber quarters. Barber dimes: most lower mintage dates/mints, including the 1895 O. Half dollars: many dates, esp: 1904S,...
Most of them, except for those melted. [Just another meaningless statement. Brought to you my yours truly. Bows to the audience.]
collect89: I MEANT to say that it was conserved. really! REALLY! Okay, I'm lying. But, I like it better now.
Ya really done good! A great buy.
wtc: Hey, I'm on Long Island, perhaps we could go detecting?
Separate names with a comma.
